Keyword summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,618 of 38,344 keywords). This The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Rock Springs1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠68%The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,692
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina vs sitewide
The Nature Conservancy In South Carolina attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos