Keyword summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Appeals Court Ruling results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 525 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,185 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (22,768 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Appeals Court Ruling is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Texas Appeals Court Ruling
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,185
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Texas Appeals Court Ruling attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Texas Appeals Court Ruling vs sitewide
Texas Appeals Court Ruling attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos