Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwan Elections results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 926 hits. Analysis detected 6,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,295 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (13,126 of 28,615 keywords). This Taiwan Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Taiwan Elections
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Taiwan Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Taiwan Elections vs sitewide
Taiwan Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.