Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Surprise Bills results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ā 2% (36,977 of 37,536 keywords). This Surprise Bills is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Surprise Bills
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Lieutenant Governor1%
ā 0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
ā 0%Texas Supreme Court1%
ā 0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
ā 0%Running Back1%
ā 2%Surprise Bills (selected)2%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Surprise Bills attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Surprise Bills vs sitewide
Surprise Bills attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos