Keyword summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Threats Increase results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 1,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,555 of 26,830 keywords). This Supreme Court Threats Increase is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Threats Increase
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠87%Supreme Court Threats Increase (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,308
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supreme Court Threats Increase attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supreme Court Threats Increase vs sitewide
Supreme Court Threats Increase attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos