Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Oral Arguments results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 6,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,042 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,801 of 28,615 keywords). This Supreme Court Oral Arguments is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠49%Supreme Court Oral Arguments (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,042
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supreme Court Oral Arguments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supreme Court Oral Arguments vs sitewide
Supreme Court Oral Arguments attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos