Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Appeal results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 2,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,175 of 28,628 keywords). This Supreme Court Appeal is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Appeal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠26%Supreme Court Appeal (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supreme Court Appeal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supreme Court Appeal vs sitewide
Supreme Court Appeal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos