Keyword summary
ā 73%1 analyzed article/video490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Spending results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,470 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (10,906 of 37,536 keywords). This Supplemental Spending is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Supplemental Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Lieutenant Governor1%
ā 0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
ā 0%Texas Supreme Court1%
ā 0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
ā 0%Running Back1%
ā 71%Supplemental Spending (selected)5%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,470
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supplemental Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supplemental Spending vs sitewide
Supplemental Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos