Keyword summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Opportunity Act results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 552 hits. Analysis detected 2,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,082 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,672 of 28,402 keywords). This Student Opportunity Act is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Student Opportunity Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠73%Student Opportunity Act (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,082
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Student Opportunity Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Student Opportunity Act vs sitewide
Student Opportunity Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos