Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford University results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 3,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,239 of 28,615 keywords). This Stanford University is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Stanford University
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠37%Stanford University (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,488
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stanford University attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stanford University vs sitewide
Stanford University attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos