Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stabbing Penn Station results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 2,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,965 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Stabbing Penn Station is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stabbing Penn Station
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stabbing Penn Station attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stabbing Penn Station vs sitewide
Stabbing Penn Station attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.