Keyword summary
28%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southern Center For Human Rights results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,481 of 37,536 keywords). This Southern Center For Human Rights is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Southern Center For Human Rights
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Southern Center For Human Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Southern Center For Human Rights vs sitewide
Southern Center For Human Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.