Keyword summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shasta Trinity National Forest results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 668 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (8,558 of 28,663 keywords). This Shasta Trinity National Forest is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Shasta Trinity National Forest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Anthony Broadwater1%
ā 0%Alice Sebold1%
ā 71%Shasta Trinity National Forest (selected)5%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Shasta Trinity National Forest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Shasta Trinity National Forest vs sitewide
Shasta Trinity National Forest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos