Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senatorial Debate results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 3,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,091 of 29,241 keywords). This Senatorial Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Senatorial Debate
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senatorial Debate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senatorial Debate vs sitewide
Senatorial Debate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.