Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Swearing In results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,415 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,624 of 28,615 keywords). This Senate Swearing In is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Senate Swearing In
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠77%Senate Swearing In (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,415
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Swearing In attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Swearing In vs sitewide
Senate Swearing In attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos