Keyword summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Leadership Fund results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (35,795 of 38,263 keywords). This Senate Leadership Fund is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Senate Leadership Fund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Rock Springs1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠7%Senate Leadership Fund (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Leadership Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Leadership Fund vs sitewide
Senate Leadership Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos