Keyword summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Intelligence Committee results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,765 of 28,017 keywords). This Senate Intelligence Committee is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Senate Intelligence Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠41%Senate Intelligence Committee (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,407
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Intelligence Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Intelligence Committee vs sitewide
Senate Intelligence Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos