Keyword summary
97%5 analyzed articles/videos4,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Hearing results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 4,718 hits. Analysis detected 24,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,755 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (17,288 of 28,625 keywords). This Senate Hearing is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Senate Hearing
Keyword details
Total words: 20,755
Article count: 5
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Hearing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Hearing vs sitewide
Senate Hearing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.