Keyword summary
ā 90%1 analyzed article/video3,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Finance Committee results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 2,322 hits. Analysis detected 12,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,189 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 75% (7,556 of 29,242 keywords). This Senate Finance Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Senate Finance Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Borders1%
ā 0%French Revolution1%
ā 75%Senate Finance Committee (selected)5%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,189
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Finance Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Finance Committee vs sitewide
Senate Finance Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos