BS Summary: These Senate Election results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,515 hits. Analysis detected 15,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,632 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (19,283 of 23,398 keywords). This Senate Election is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Senate Election
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Election attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Election vs All Other Publications
Senate Election attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.