Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Senate Appropriations Committee results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 32,734 keywords). This Senate Appropriations Committee is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Senate Appropriations Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Borders1%
ā 0%French Revolution1%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
ā 0%Senate Appropriations Committee (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Appropriations Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Appropriations Committee vs sitewide
Senate Appropriations Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos