Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Immigration Court results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 3,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ā 35% (18,963 of 29,140 keywords). This Seattle Immigration Court is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Seattle Immigration Court
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Borders1%
ā 0%French Revolution1%
ā 35%Seattle Immigration Court (selected)3%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Seattle Immigration Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Seattle Immigration Court vs sitewide
Seattle Immigration Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos