Keyword summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Of Reading results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 5,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,885 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (28,697 of 33,611 keywords). This Science Of Reading is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Science Of Reading
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠15%Science Of Reading (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,885
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Science Of Reading attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Science Of Reading vs sitewide
Science Of Reading attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos