Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Funding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,137 hits. Analysis detected 10,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,783 of 37,536 keywords). This Science Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Science Funding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠50%Science Funding (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Science Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Science Funding vs sitewide
Science Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos