Keyword summary
20%1 analyzed article/video1,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Advances results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 3,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (14,840 of 25,937 keywords). This Science Advances is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Science Advances
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Science Advances attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Science Advances vs sitewide
Science Advances attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.