Keyword summary
89%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safeguarding Democracy Project results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 417 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of 100% (107 of 30,603 keywords). This Safeguarding Democracy Project is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Safeguarding Democracy Project
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Safeguarding Democracy Project attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Safeguarding Democracy Project vs sitewide
Safeguarding Democracy Project attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.