Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safe Drinking Water Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 942 hits. Analysis detected 5,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (26,526 of 37,536 keywords). This Safe Drinking Water Act is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Safe Drinking Water Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠30%Safe Drinking Water Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,696
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Safe Drinking Water Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Safe Drinking Water Act vs sitewide
Safe Drinking Water Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos