Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sacramento Federal Court results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Sacramento Federal Court is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sacramento Federal Court
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sacramento Federal Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sacramento Federal Court vs sitewide
Sacramento Federal Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos