Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royal Academy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (14,667 of 28,615 keywords). This Royal Academy is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Royal Academy
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Royal Academy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Royal Academy vs sitewide
Royal Academy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.