Keyword summary
â 94%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rigged Elections results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 3,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of â 75% (6,827 of 26,634 keywords). This Rigged Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Rigged Elections
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rigged Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rigged Elections vs sitewide
Rigged Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.