Keyword summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation Process results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 392 hits. Analysis detected 2,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (13,605 of 25,411 keywords). This Reconciliation Process is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Reconciliation Process
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%Nationalism1%
⁠0%West Olympic Boulevard1%
⁠47%Reconciliation Process (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,488
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Reconciliation Process attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Reconciliation Process vs All Other Publications
Reconciliation Process attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos