Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queens Judge results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 2,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,206 of 28,615 keywords). This Queens Judge is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Queens Judge
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠61%Queens Judge (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Queens Judge attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Queens Judge vs sitewide
Queens Judge attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos