Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queen Esther results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 50% (14,391 of 28,625 keywords). This Queen Esther is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Queen Esther
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Anthony Broadwater1%
ā 0%Alice Sebold1%
ā 50%Queen Esther (selected)3%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,604
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Queen Esther attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Queen Esther vs sitewide
Queen Esther attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos