Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Protect Our Polls Act results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 476 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 33,356 keywords). This Protect Our Polls Act is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Protect Our Polls Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Protect Our Polls Act (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 477
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Protect Our Polls Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Protect Our Polls Act vs sitewide
Protect Our Polls Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos