Keyword summary
55%1 analyzed article/video702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professor Rachel Godsil results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 1,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,533 of 38,339 keywords). This Professor Rachel Godsil is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Professor Rachel Godsil
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Professor Rachel Godsil attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Professor Rachel Godsil vs sitewide
Professor Rachel Godsil attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.