Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Presidential Finance results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 593 hits. Analysis detected 3,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Finance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Finance
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Finance attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Finance vs sitewide
Presidential Finance attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.