Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Stokes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,343 of 37,329 keywords). This Peter Stokes is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Peter Stokes
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Stokes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Stokes vs sitewide
Peter Stokes attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.