Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Mandelson results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,185 hits. Analysis detected 8,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,265 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,187 of 28,615 keywords). This Peter Mandelson is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Peter Mandelson
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Mandelson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Mandelson vs sitewide
Peter Mandelson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.