Keyword summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Per Diem Benefits results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 3,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (9,617 of 32,257 keywords). This Per Diem Benefits is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Per Diem Benefits
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠71%Per Diem Benefits (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Per Diem Benefits attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Per Diem Benefits vs sitewide
Per Diem Benefits attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos