Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon Spending results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,059 hits. Analysis detected 4,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,695 of 28,615 keywords). This Pentagon Spending is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Pentagon Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠42%Pentagon Spending (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pentagon Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pentagon Spending vs sitewide
Pentagon Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos