Keyword summary
9%1 analyzed article/video644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penn State results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 613 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,879 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,022 of 37,536 keywords). This Penn State is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Penn State
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Penn State attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Penn State vs sitewide
Penn State attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.