Keyword summary
91%1 analyzed article/video1,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Newman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 1,563 hits. Analysis detected 6,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 62% (10,547 of 27,146 keywords). This Paul Newman is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Paul Newman
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Newman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Newman vs sitewide
Paul Newman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.