Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parliamentary Budget Office results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (19,704 of 37,536 keywords). This Parliamentary Budget Office is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Parliamentary Budget Office
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Parliamentary Budget Office attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Parliamentary Budget Office vs sitewide
Parliamentary Budget Office attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos