Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oral Arguments results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 774 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (14,119 of 28,615 keywords). This Oral Arguments is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Oral Arguments
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Oral Arguments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Oral Arguments vs sitewide
Oral Arguments attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.