Keyword summary
53%1 analyzed article/video647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio Senate Race results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 2,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (12,058 of 28,569 keywords). This Ohio Senate Race is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Ohio Senate Race
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ohio Senate Race attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ohio Senate Race vs sitewide
Ohio Senate Race attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.