Keyword summary
ā 87%1 analyzed article/video940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Historic Preservation Act results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 797 hits. Analysis detected 5,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ā 84% (5,192 of 32,257 keywords). This National Historic Preservation Act is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
National Historic Preservation Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Borders1%
ā 0%French Revolution1%
ā 84%National Historic Preservation Act (selected)6%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
National Historic Preservation Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
National Historic Preservation Act vs sitewide
National Historic Preservation Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos