Keyword summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Endowment For The Humanities results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,922 of 30,603 keywords). This National Endowment For The Humanities is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
National Endowment For The Humanities
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠91%National Endowment For The Humanities (selected)8%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 882
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
National Endowment For The Humanities attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
National Endowment For The Humanities vs sitewide
National Endowment For The Humanities attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos