Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naomi Osaka results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,947 hits. Analysis detected 12,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,856 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (25,097 of 28,628 keywords). This Naomi Osaka is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Naomi Osaka
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠13%Naomi Osaka (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,856
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Naomi Osaka attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Naomi Osaka vs sitewide
Naomi Osaka attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos