Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monsanto V Durnell results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 934 hits. Analysis detected 5,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (18,165 of 37,536 keywords). This Monsanto V Durnell is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Monsanto V Durnell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠52%Monsanto V Durnell (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Monsanto V Durnell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Monsanto V Durnell vs sitewide
Monsanto V Durnell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos