Keyword summary
18%1 analyzed article/video618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Public Utilities Commission results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 1,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (13,377 of 25,937 keywords). This Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission vs sitewide
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.